Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1262918
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (301)



 


 



Sentence Reduction as a Remedy for Prosecutorial Misconduct


Sonja B. Starr


University of Michigan Law School

September 2, 2008

U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-31

Abstract:     
Current remedies for prosecutorial misconduct, such as reversal of conviction or dismissal of charges, are rarely granted by courts and thus do not deter prosecutors effectively. Further, such all-or-nothing remedial schemes are often problematic from corrective and expressive perspectives, especially when misconduct has not affected the trial verdict. When granted, such remedies produce windfalls to guilty defendants and provoke public resentment, undermining their expressive value in condemning misconduct. To avoid such windfalls, courts must refuse to grant any remedy at all, either refusing to recognize violations or deeming them harmless. This often leaves significant non-conviction-related harms unremedied and egregious prosecutorial misconduct uncondemned.

This Article accordingly proposes adding sentence reduction to current all-or-nothing remedial schemes, arguing that this would provide courts with an intermediate remedy that they would be more willing to grant. It argues that several prosecutorial incentives combine to make sentence reduction an effective deterrent. Moreover, because sentence reduction could be tailored to the magnitude of the violation, it could resolve the windfall dilemma and serve as an effective corrective and expressive remedy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

Keywords: prosecutorial misconduct, sentence reduction, remedial deterrence, harmless error, Batson, speedy trial, criminal procedure remedies, prosecutorial incentives, expressive remedies, deterrent remedies, corrective justice

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 5, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Starr, Sonja B., Sentence Reduction as a Remedy for Prosecutorial Misconduct (September 2, 2008). U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-31. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1262918 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1262918

Contact Information

Sonja B. Starr (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State St
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States
617 821-1222 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,242
Downloads: 266
Download Rank: 64,520
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  301

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.265 seconds