Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1263376
 
 

Footnotes (261)



 


 



Dr. Miles is Dead. Now What?: Structuring a Rule of Reason for Evaluating Minimum Resale Price Maintenance


Thomas A. Lambert


University of Missouri - School of Law

September 4, 2008

University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-25

Abstract:     
In Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., decided in 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled its 1911 precedent declaring vertical minimum resale price maintenance (RPM) to be per se illegal. The Leegin Court held that the practice should instead be examined on a case-by-case basis under antitrust's rule of reason. The Court further exhorted the lower courts to craft a "structured" rule of reason for evaluating RPM. This article critiques six approaches that have been proposed for evaluating minimum RPM and offers an alternative approach. The six approaches critiqued are (1) the Brandeisian, unstructured rule of reason; (2) Judge Posner's rule of per se legality; (3) the approach advocated by 27 states in the recent Nine West case; (4) the approach adopted by the Federal Trade Commission in that case; (5) the approach advocated by economists William Comanor and F.M. Scherer; and (6) the approach proposed in the Areeda & Hovenkamp Antitrust Law treatise. Finding each of these approaches deficient, the article proposes an alternative evaluative approach that harnesses economic learning and allocates proof burdens in a manner that minimizes the sum of decision and error costs, thereby maximizing the net social benefits of RPM regulation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

Keywords: antitrust, Dr. Miles, Leegin, resale price maintenance, rule of reason, vertical price restraints, vertical restraints, vertical-price fixing

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 4, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Lambert, Thomas A., Dr. Miles is Dead. Now What?: Structuring a Rule of Reason for Evaluating Minimum Resale Price Maintenance (September 4, 2008). University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-25. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1263376 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1263376

Contact Information

Thomas Andrew Lambert (Contact Author)
University of Missouri - School of Law ( email )
Missouri Avenue & Conley Avenue
Columbia, MO 65211
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,538
Downloads: 441
Download Rank: 37,210
Footnotes:  261

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.296 seconds