|
||||
|
||||
Guidelines Simplification: Still an Urgent Priority Post-BookerMichael M. O'HearMarquette University - Law School September 4, 2008 Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 20, 2008 Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 08-20 Abstract: This Essay argues that Federal Sentencing Guidelines would benefit from substantial restructuring and simplification. Although the status of the Guidelines has recently changed from mandatory to merely advisory, the Guidelines remain a highly influential part of the federal sentencing process, and their reform remains an urgent priority. Simplified guidelines, as proposed in 2006 by a working group of sentencing experts, would provide fairer sentences, better accommodate new procedural safeguards, and insulate the Guidelines from counterproductive tinkering by the political branches. This Essay appears as part of a forthcoming issue of the Federal Sentencing Reporter (Vol. 20, No. 5) containing advice on sentencing policy for the new President and Congress.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 3 Keywords: sentencing, sentencing guidelines, guidelines, booker JEL Classification: K14, K42 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 5, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds