Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1263474
 
 

References (89)



 
 

Citations (6)



 


 



Unilateral Effects Under the Guidelines: Models, Merits, and Merger Policy


Malcolm B. Coate


U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

May 10, 2011


Abstract:     
This paper models Federal Trade Commission unilateral effects merger policy using a sample of 184 investigations undertaken between 1993 and 2010. A review of the files suggests that roughly half of the sample is evaluated with a dominant firm/monopoly model, while the rest of the cases require a more complex unilateral effects analysis. Statistical analysis shows the number of significant rivals represents the best structural proxy for the Federal Trade Commission’s policy choice, although other variables, such as fringe share, market leadership entry, effects’ evidence, and vertical issues also affect the outcome. Some of these variables suggest that the innovations in the 2010 Merger Guidelines were already applied in merger analysis. Material on deterministic models and case study review of merger investigations, discussed in a previous draft of this paper, is now available in Unilateral Effects Analysis and the Upward Pricing Pressure Model: Evidence from the Federal Trade Commission, 2011, Available at SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1837645

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: Merger Guidelines, Federal Trade Commission, unilateral effects, evidence

JEL Classification: L40, K21

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 5, 2008 ; Last revised: May 12, 2011

Suggested Citation

Coate, Malcolm B., Unilateral Effects Under the Guidelines: Models, Merits, and Merger Policy (May 10, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1263474 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1263474

Contact Information

Malcolm B. Coate (Contact Author)
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ( email )
601 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20580
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,250
Downloads: 251
Download Rank: 68,691
References:  89
Citations:  6

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds