Indiana University Maurer School of Law
September 4, 2008
Trial Magazine, October 2008
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 117
"Original Sin" discusses the Supreme Court's attempt to discern the original meaning of the Constitution as the basis of two recent decisions: the Second Amendment case, Heller v. Dist. of Columbia, and the much less well known Sixth Amendment case of Giles v. California. It focuses primarily on Giles, where the question was whether the defendant in a murder trial had forfeited his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him by killing the victim. The California courts had held that this was "forfeiture by wrongdoing" and consequently the victim's prior hearsay statements against the defendant could be used. The Supreme Court, after much futile discussion of history, concluded that only if the defendant's wrongdoing was for the purpose of preventing a witness from testifying would he forfeit his Sixth Amendment right.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: Criminal Procedure, Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause, Forfeiture by Wrongdoing
JEL Classification: K14Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 6, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.266 seconds