Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1263591
 
 

Footnotes (27)



 


 



Original Sin


Craig Bradley


Indiana University Maurer School of Law


Trial Magazine, October 2008
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 117

Abstract:     
"Original Sin" discusses the Supreme Court's attempt to discern the original meaning of the Constitution as the basis of two recent decisions: the Second Amendment case, Heller v. Dist. of Columbia, and the much less well known Sixth Amendment case of Giles v. California. It focuses primarily on Giles, where the question was whether the defendant in a murder trial had forfeited his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him by killing the victim. The California courts had held that this was "forfeiture by wrongdoing" and consequently the victim's prior hearsay statements against the defendant could be used. The Supreme Court, after much futile discussion of history, concluded that only if the defendant's wrongdoing was for the purpose of preventing a witness from testifying would he forfeit his Sixth Amendment right.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: Criminal Procedure, Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause, Forfeiture by Wrongdoing

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 6, 2008 ; Last revised: July 1, 2013

Suggested Citation

Bradley, Craig, Original Sin. Trial Magazine, October 2008; Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 117. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1263591

Contact Information

Craig Bradley (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 514
Downloads: 48
Footnotes:  27

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.313 seconds