Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve the Information Environment?
London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Department of Accounting and Finance
Harvard University - Harvard Business School
affiliation not provided to SSRN
September 5, 2008
Contemporary Accounting Research, Forthcoming
More than 120 countries require or permit the use of International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) by publicly listed companies on the basis of higher information quality and accounting comparability from IFRS application. However, the empirical evidence about these presumed benefits are often conflicting and fail to separate between information quality and comparability. In this paper we examine the effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on firms’ information environment. We find that after mandatory IFRS adoption consensus forecast errors decrease for firms that mandatorily adopt IFRS relative to forecast errors of other firms. We also find decreasing forecast errors for voluntary adopters, but this effect is smaller and not robust. Moreover, we show that the magnitude of the forecast errors decrease is associated with the firm-specific differences between local GAAP and IFRS. This finding suggests that it is IFRS adoption rather than a correlated unobservable factor that is causing forecast errors to decrease. Exploiting individual analyst level data and isolating settings where analysts would benefit more from either increased comparability or higher quality information, we document that the improvement in the information environment is driven both by information and comparability effects. These results suggest that mandatory IFRS adoption has improved the quality of information intermediation in capital markets and as a result firms’ information environment by increasing both information quality and accounting comparability.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 57
Keywords: IFRS, analysts, information environment, comparability, information quality
JEL Classification: M41, M44, M47, G14, G15, G29Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 6, 2008 ; Last revised: January 23, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.625 seconds