Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1265229
 
 

Footnotes (312)



 


 



Connecting the Dots Between the Constitution, the Marshall Trilogy, and United States v. Lara: Notes Toward a Blueprint for the Next Legislative Restoration of Tribal Sovereignty


Ann E. Tweedy


Hamline University School of Law

September 8, 2008

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Vol. 42, No. 3, p. 651, 2009

Abstract:     
This law review article examines: (1) the underpinnings of tribal sovereignty within the American system; (2) the need for restoration based on the Court's drastic incursions on tribal sovereignty over the past four decades and the grave circumstances, particularly tribal governments' inability to protect tribal interests on the reservation and unchecked violence in Indian Country, that result from the divestment of tribal sovereignty; (3) the concept of restoration as illuminated by United States v. Lara, and finally (4) some possible approaches to partial restoration.

The article first evaluates the constitutional provisions relating to Indians and the earliest federal Indian law decisions written by Chief Justice Marshall on the premise that these two sources shed light on the upper limits of a potential legislative restoration of tribal sovereignty. Next, the article examines the judicial trend of divestment of tribal sovereignty, focusing particularly on the latest decisions that evidence this trend. The article further examines the negative effects of this divestment in Indian Country, from impeding tribes' ability to provide governmental services and to protect their unique institutions, to problems of widespread on-reservation violence, particularly against Indian women. The article concludes that the judicial trend of divesting tribal sovereignty combined with these dire effects clearly demonstrate a need for restoration.

Finally, the article examines the Lara holding and its implications for the types of restoration that will be upheld by Court, concluding with an examination of options for potential legislative restorations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 67

Keywords: federal Indian law, tribal sovereignty, tribal jurisdiction, restoration of tribal sovereignty, Marshall Trilogy, constitutional law, United States v. Lara, restoration of tribal sovereignty, federal courts

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 11, 2008 ; Last revised: January 30, 2010

Suggested Citation

Tweedy, Ann E., Connecting the Dots Between the Constitution, the Marshall Trilogy, and United States v. Lara: Notes Toward a Blueprint for the Next Legislative Restoration of Tribal Sovereignty (September 8, 2008). University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Vol. 42, No. 3, p. 651, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1265229

Contact Information

Ann E. Tweedy (Contact Author)
Hamline University School of Law ( email )
1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237
United States
651-523-2076 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,317
Downloads: 108
Download Rank: 147,056
Footnotes:  312

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.282 seconds