Abstract

 
 

References (45)



 


 



Broadband Policy: Does the U.S. Have it Right after All?


Jeffrey A. Eisenach


Navigant Economics LLC; George Mason University School of Law

September 9, 2008


Abstract:     
In this paper, I compare U.S. and (briefly) Canadian broadband policies and outcomes with the policies and outcomes in other advanced nations. The results show that the relatively deregulatory American approach to broadband policy has produced highly desirable results, including high levels of investment and innovation, nearly ubiquitous broadband availability, high and increasing levels of penetration, falling prices, and high levels of consumer satisfaction. Indeed, the U.S. model is producing better overall results than in countries which continue to pursue mandatory unbundling and other highly regulatory approaches. Moreover, the advantages of the American model are likely to grow more pronounced over time. To avoid being left behind, other nations should abandon policies based on mandatory resale of incumbent networks and adopt the American approach.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: broadband, telecommunications, unbundling

JEL Classification: K23, L51, L96

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 9, 2008 ; Last revised: October 23, 2012

Suggested Citation

Eisenach, Jeffrey A., Broadband Policy: Does the U.S. Have it Right after All? (September 9, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1265579 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265579

Contact Information

Jeffrey A. Eisenach (Contact Author)
Navigant Economics LLC ( email )
1200 19th St. NW
Suite 850
Washington, DC 20036
United States
202-448-9029 (Phone)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 433
Downloads: 33
References:  45

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 2.250 seconds