|
||||
|
||||
Cross-National Logo Evaluation Analysis: An Individual Level ApproachRalf Van der LansRotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University; VU University Amsterdam - Faculty of Law Joseph A. CoteWashington State University - Department of Marketing Catherine ColeUniversity of Iowa - Henry B. Tippie College of Business Siew Meng LeongNUS Business School, National University of Singapore A. SmidtsErasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM) Pamela W. Hendersonaffiliation not provided to SSRN Christian Bluemelhuberaffiliation not provided to SSRN Paul A. BottomleyCardiff University - Cardiff Business School John R. DoyleCardiff University - Cardiff Business School Alexander Fedorikhinaffiliation not provided to SSRN M. JanakiramanIndian Institute of Management (IIM), Lucknow B. Ramaseshanaffiliation not provided to SSRN Bernard Schmittaffiliation not provided to SSRN February 2008 9, ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2008-055-MKT Abstract: The universality of design perception and response is tested using data collected from ten countries: Argentina, Australia, China, Germany, Great Britain, India, the Netherlands, Russia, Singapore, and the United States. A Bayesian, finite-mixture, structural-equation model is developed that identifies latent logo clusters while accounting for heterogeneity in evaluations. The concomitant variable approach allows cluster probabilities to be country specific. Rather than a priori defined clusters, our procedure provides a posteriori cross-national logo clusters based on consumer response similarity. To compare the a posteriori cross-national logo clusters, our approach is integrated with Steenkamp and Baumgartner’s (1998) measurement invariance methodology. Our model reduces the ten countries to three cross-national clusters that respond differently to logo design dimensions: the West, Asia, and Russia. The dimensions underlying design are found to be similar across countries, suggesting that elaborateness, naturalness, and harmony are universal design dimensions. Responses (affect, shared meaning, subjective familiarity, and true and false recognition) to logo design dimensions (elaborateness, naturalness, and harmony) and elements (repetition, proportion, and parallelism) are also relatively consistent, although we find minor differences across clusters. Our results suggest that managers can implement a global logo strategy, but they also can optimize logos for specific countries if desired.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 59 Keywords: design, logos, international marketing, standardization, adaptation, structural equation models, Gibbs sampling, concomitant variable, Bayesian, mixture models JEL Classification: C44, M31, M, M37 working papers seriesDate posted: September 10, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.406 seconds