|
||||
|
||||
Policymaking for PosterityLawrence H. SummersHarvard University; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Richard J. ZeckhauserHarvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) September 10, 2008 HKS Working Paper No. RWP08-040 Harvard Law School Program on Risk Regulation Research Paper No. 08-2 Abstract: Policymaking for posterity involves current decisions with distant consequences. Contrary to conventional prescriptions, we conclude that the greater wealth of future generations may strengthen the case for preserving environmental amenities; lower discount rates should be applied to the far future, and special effort should be made to avoid actions that impose costs on future generations. Posterity brings great uncertainties. Even massive losses, such as human extinction, however, do not merit infinite negative utility. Given learning, greater uncertainties about damages could increase or decrease the optimal level of current mitigation activities. Policies for posterity should anticipate effects on: alternative investments, both public and private; the actions of other nations; and the behaviors of future generations. Such effects may surprise. This analysis blends traditional public finance and behavioral economics with a number of hypothetical choice problems.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55 Keywords: Business and Government Policy, International Economics, Microeconomics, Environment and Natural Resources, International Affairs/Globalization, Science¿ Technology and Public Policy JEL Classification: D90, D64, Q54, D81 working papers seriesDate posted: September 11, 2008 ; Last revised: November 12, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.313 seconds