Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1266835
 
 

Footnotes (115)



 


 



Paradoxically Speaking


David McGowan


University of San Diego School of Law


San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 08-077

Abstract:     
This essay reviews Copyright's Paradox by Neil Weinstock Netanel. It argues both that the book is the best exposition of the free speech critique of copyright and that the critique suffers two flaws. First it must cherry-pick among strands of free speech theory, emphasizing some and ignoring others. It thereby sacrifices a claim to be grounded in any conception of freedom of expression as such.

Second, in Netanel's version the critique holds that judges and legislators may intervene selectively in the expressive environment to make that environment more robust. Such intervention includes favoring some types of speech over others. To the extent this claim is true it undermines the premise that government actors are incapable of determining the socially optimal level of various kinds of expression. Without that premise, however, the free speech principle itself is undercut, and the free speech critique of copyright with it. I propose that this is the most interesting paradox Netanel's book identifies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: copyright, first amendment, speech

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 15, 2008  

Suggested Citation

McGowan, David, Paradoxically Speaking. San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 08-077. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1266835 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1266835

Contact Information

David McGowan (Contact Author)
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 696
Downloads: 147
Download Rank: 111,774
Footnotes:  115

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds