|
||||
|
||||
Benefits from U.S. Monetary Policy Experimentation in the Days of Samuelson and Solow and Lucas
Timothy Cogley University of California, Davis - Department of Economics Riccardo Colacito UNC Chapel Hill Thomas J. Sargent Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2007 Abstract: A policy maker knows two models of inflation-unemployment dynamics. One implies an exploitable trade-off. The other does not. The policy maker's prior probability over the two models is part of his state vector. Bayes law converts the prior into a posterior at each date and gives the policy maker an incentive to experiment. For a model calibrated to U.S. data through the early 1960s, we isolate the component of government policy that is due to experimentation by comparing the outcomes from two Bellman equations, the first of which embodies a `experiment and learn' setup, the second of which embodies a `don't experiment, do learn' view. We interpret the second as an example of an `anticipated utility' model and study how well its outcomes approximate those from the `experiment and learn' Bellman equation. Accepted Paper Series Date posted: September 15, 2008 ; Last revised: September 15, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.453 seconds.