|
||||
|
||||
Are Foreign Directors Valuable Advisors or Ineffective Monitors?
Ronald W. Masulis Vanderbilt University - Owen Graduate School of Management; Vanderbilt University - School of Law Cong Wang Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Department of Finance Fei Xie George Mason University - School of Management May 18, 2009 ECGI - Finance Working Paper No. 242/2009 Abstract: During the period of 1998 to 2006, over 13% of large U.S. public corporations have independent directors domiciled in foreign countries. We find that firms appointing foreign independent directors (FIDs) experience significantly negative announcement-period abnormal stock returns and the presence of FIDs leads to significant lower firm performance and value. Further analyses reveal that FIDs are more likely to miss board meetings than U.S. based directors and firms with FIDs on board give their CEOs excessively high compensation and are more prone to commit financial misreporting that requires future restatement. Overall, our findings support the conjecture that FIDs’ geographic location creates significant logistical and informational problems hindering their ability to engage in the governance of firms, and as a result, they undermine board effectiveness and lead to more agency problems and poor firm performance. We find only limited evidence that firms benefit from the international perspective and expertise of FIDs.
Keywords: Corporate governance, boards of directors, foreign directors JEL Classifications: G34 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: September 18, 2008 ; Last revised: May 20, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.109 seconds.