Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1268897
 
 

Footnotes (334)



 


 



Multiple Families, Multiple Goals, Multiple Failures


Adrienne Lockie


affiliation not provided to SSRN

September 16, 2008

Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, Vol. 32, p. 109, Winter 2009

Abstract:     
Current child support laws are based on false assumptions about families that fail to reflect family complexity and the realities of parenting. As a result, the federal goals of child support laws are not met. New federal child support goals should be centered on the needs of poor families and multiple families and should consider more of the resources available to the families.

Multiple families are families where at least one existing parent has a child with a different partner. Federal child support laws ignore the way that children in multiple families compete for the limited resources of their parents. States lack guidance about how to choose between the two policy ways to allocate child support among families, "first family first" or "equalization."

This Article argues that the federal government should provide guidance to the states in answering the question of who bears the cost of subsequent families; this article proposes a new theory of child support, "limited equalization," which makes an explicit policy choice in favor of existing families.

Limited equalization includes five new child support goals: (1) an explicit policy choice about supporting multiple families giving a preference to existing families; (2) attention to the demographics of the families that need child support; (3) an expanded definition of parenting and the duty of support; (4) attention to poverty prevention; and (5) attention to gender equality. Limited equalization re-envisions the goals of child support and provides a mechanism to examine all of the circumstances and realities of the families in calculating child support awards. This major structural change attempts to address the complexities of child support, particularly in multiple families, while giving preference to existing families.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 84

Keywords: Child Support, Gender, Family Law

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 17, 2008 ; Last revised: July 31, 2009

Suggested Citation

Lockie, Adrienne, Multiple Families, Multiple Goals, Multiple Failures (September 16, 2008). Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, Vol. 32, p. 109, Winter 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1268897

Contact Information

Adrienne Lockie (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 933
Downloads: 81
Download Rank: 186,699
Footnotes:  334

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds