Workplace Mythologies and Unemployment Insurance: Exit, Voice and Exhausting All Reasonable Alternatives to Quitting
Deborah A. Maranville
University of Washington School of Law
March 1, 2002
Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 31, p. 459, 2003
This article argues that the requirement that workers exhaust alternatives to quitting in order to qualify for unemployment benefits is misguided. The requirement is premised on inaccurate assumptions about the world of work and the situation of employees. Albert Hirschman's Exit, Voice and Loyalty provides a theoretical framework for thinking about decisions to stay or leave in the economic and political realms. The exhaustion requirement is premised on a vision of employment as more like a political community than an economic marketplace. While this vision may be an attractive aspiration, it has little foundation in most twenty-first century workplaces.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55
Keywords: unemployment insurance, compensation, benefits, exhaustion requirement, Hirschman, exit, voice, work, employmentAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 19, 2008 ; Last revised: July 28, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.438 seconds