Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1270181
 
 

Footnotes (375)



 


 



Justinian's Digest: The Distribution of Authors and Works to the Three Committees


Tony Honoré


University of Oxford - Faculty of Law


Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 30/2008

Abstract:     
This essay addresses a set of related problems about the compilation of Justinian's Digest. Suppose that, as scholars have long believed, Bluhme was right in detecting the existence of three separate masses of works to be read and excerpted by the Digest commissioners and of three separate committees (the Sabinian, the Papinian and the edictal) to read them. How, then, was it decided which works to allot to each mass, and which works should be read together? The allocation was crucial, because Tribonian could not personally supervise the selection of texts made by the committees, at any rate those on which he did not himself serve. How did he ensure that the best texts would be chosen?

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 23, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Honoré, Tony, Justinian's Digest: The Distribution of Authors and Works to the Three Committees. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 30/2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1270181 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1270181

Contact Information

Tony Honoré (Contact Author)
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )
St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 718
Downloads: 122
Download Rank: 130,584
Footnotes:  375

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.516 seconds