Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1272550
 


 



Rethinking Press Rights of Equal Access


Luke M. Milligan


University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law

September 23, 2008

Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 66, No. 3, 2008
University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2009-07

Abstract:     
The prevailing approach to First Amendment equal-access litigation, turning on the "general inclusivity" of government access, is deeply flawed. The standard has proved to be, in the end, unduly formalistic, hopelessly vague, and, perhaps most importantly, theoretically incompatible with the Supreme Court's emerging view that access is a form of government subsidy.

This paper calls on the courts to abandon their reliance on inclusiveness, and, in its place, tailor the definition of "access" to include only those government acts conducted "pursuant to official duties." The resulting doctrine would be one worthy of the federal courts - durable, coherent, and duly respectful of the traditional relations between public officials and the press.

Keywords: First Amendment, Press Access, Employee Speech

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 21, 2009 ; Last revised: September 23, 2009

Suggested Citation

Milligan, Luke M., Rethinking Press Rights of Equal Access (September 23, 2008). Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 66, No. 3, 2008; University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2009-07. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1272550

Contact Information

Luke M. Milligan (Contact Author)
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law ( email )
Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 221
Downloads: 18

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds