Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1272703
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (203)



 


 



Automating Contract Law


George S. Geis


University of Virginia School of Law

June 1, 2008

New York University Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, 2008

Abstract:     
The study of contract law is undergoing a difficult transition as it moves from the theoretical to the empirical. Over the past few decades scholars have focused largely on developing economic theories that offer a normative approach to setting the legal rules governing voluntary exchange. The time has now come to test whether these theories provide a meaningful basis for choosing our laws - in other words, to ask whether empirical data supports the theoretical models that contracts scholars have posited. Unfortunately, this type of empirical analysis has proven exceptionally difficult to conduct, and some commentators are beginning to question whether it will ever be possible to test and revise our economic theories of contract in a meaningful manner. Yet the problem of harnessing information to support complex decisions is not unique to contract law. This Essay explores the possibility that recent technological developments from the field of organizational knowledge management - including advances in meaning-based computing algorithms - will soon make it easier to conduct empirical work in contract law on a much larger scale.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: contract law, empirical analysis, knowledge management

JEL Classification: K12

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 24, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Geis, George S., Automating Contract Law (June 1, 2008). New York University Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1272703

Contact Information

George S. Geis (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 499
Downloads: 66
Download Rank: 206,419
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  203

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds