Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1272873
 
 

References (32)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Stare Decisis, Repetition and Understanding Common Law


Chris Dent


Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia, Melbourne Law School

Ian Cook


Murdoch University, Politics and International Studies, School of Social Science and Humanities


Griffith Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 131-150, 2007
U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 361

Abstract:     
The works of Michel Foucault have not, so far, been employed so as to enable an adequate understanding of the functioning of the law. This article begins to remedy this situation. Past uses of Foucault's work have failed to provide a satisfactory account of the relationship between the juridical and the disciplinary aspects of the law in general. The application of his ideas to the practice of the common law offers a way forward. In this article, we use Foucault's ideas of discursive formations and discursive practices to understand the operation of the doctrine of stare decisis in the common law. It is uncontroversial to assert that the doctrine is difficult to define - this analysis demonstrates that this signifies its always/already nature. The understanding applied here indicates that stare decisis is best seen as a set of discursive practices - the most significant of which relates to the repetition of past legal statements. The doctrine, as a result, is both fundamental to the operation of the common law as a discursive formation and constitutive of those who participate in, and perpetuate, it - the lawyers and judges.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: functioning of law, Foucault's work, juridical and the disciplinary aspects of the law, stare decisis, discursive practices, common law

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 29, 2008 ; Last revised: February 5, 2009

Suggested Citation

Dent, Chris and Cook, Ian, Stare Decisis, Repetition and Understanding Common Law. Griffith Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 131-150, 2007; U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 361. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1272873

Contact Information

Chris Dent (Contact Author)
Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia, Melbourne Law School ( email )
Victoria, 3010
Australia
Ian Cook
Murdoch University, Politics and International Studies, School of Social Science and Humanities ( email )
South Street
Murdoch 6150, Western Australia
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,397
Downloads: 226
Download Rank: 78,744
References:  32
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds