Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1273054
 
 

Footnotes (211)



 


 



Doing the Right Thing: An Analytical Model Examining the Interplay between Ethical Professional Conduct, Morality and Justice


Paul J. Cain


Northern Illinois University

August 1, 2008

Thomas M. Cooley Journal of Practical and Clinical Law, Vol. 10, No. 2

Abstract:     
This article explores the sometimes very difficult decisions that lawyers and practicing law students must make in balancing their obligations under the applicable Code of Professional Responsibility or Model Rules of Professional Conduct, their own moral code of conduct and their sense of justice. In Professional Responsibility and Legal Ethics courses, law schools often focus primarily on the "lawyer codes" that students must learn to practice 'ethically' and to pass the Multiple-Choice Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE). However, circumstances sometimes arise in which lawyers must look beyond the legal ethics code to make complex decisions in determining what is the 'right' thing to do.

I first propose an analytical model, using a series of questions and related issues, to explore and analyze what is the 'right' thing to do in a methodical, reasoned manner. Then, I apply the analytical model utilizing three examples or scenarios. The first example is from my own law practice experience involving the decision of whether or not to testify before a grand jury regarding confidences told to me by a client who was murdered by his wife, who was the subject of the grand jury proceeding. The second example involves law students whom I supervised representing an elderly Middle-eastern woman in political asylum removal proceedings whose story was not quite credible, but who likely would be arrested and killed by the government if deported and returned to her country of origin. The students struggled with the decision of how far they could push the ethical envelope in their representation of her. The third example is a Colorado case, In the Matter of Pautler, 47 P.3d 1175 (2002), in which a prosecutor deceived a murder suspect into believing that the prosecutor was a public defender in order to get the murder suspect to surrender to police. The prosecutor's actions resulted in disciplinary sanction.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: ethics, morality, justice

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 25, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Cain, Paul J., Doing the Right Thing: An Analytical Model Examining the Interplay between Ethical Professional Conduct, Morality and Justice (August 1, 2008). Thomas M. Cooley Journal of Practical and Clinical Law, Vol. 10, No. 2. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1273054

Contact Information

Paul J. Cain (Contact Author)
Northern Illinois University ( email )
Swen Parson Hall
DeKalb, IL 60115
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 665
Downloads: 89
Download Rank: 170,781
Footnotes:  211

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.500 seconds