Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1273235
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (112)



 


 



Myth of the Color-Blind Judge: An Empirical Analysis of Racial Harassment Cases


Pat K. Chew


University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

Robert E. Kelley


Carnegie Mellon University - David A. Tepper School of Business

2008

Washington University Law Review, Vol. 86, 2009
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-29

Abstract:     
This empirical study of over 400 federal cases, representing workplace racial harassment jurisprudence over a twenty-year period, found that judges' race significantly affects outcomes in these cases. African American judges rule differently than White judges, even when we take into account their political affiliation and case characteristics. At the same time, our findings indicate that judges of all races are attentive to relevant facts of the cases but interpret them differently. Thus, while we cannot predict how an individual judge might act, our study results strongly suggest that African American judges as a group and White judges as a group perceive racial harassment differently. These findings counter the traditional myth of judicial decision-making that the race of a judge would not make a difference, since the decision-making process is presumed to be rational and objective.

Given the underrepresentation of minority judges on the federal bench, the growing minority population in the U.S., and minority skepticism of judicial fairness, this article offers empirical support for a more racially-diverse judiciary. Having more judges of color promises to increase diverse perspectives in the judicial system and to unveil the complex reality of racial dynamics in the workplace.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: civil rights, racial harassment, race discrimination, empirical research, employment practice, courts, judges

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 13, 2008 ; Last revised: January 11, 2009

Suggested Citation

Chew, Pat K. and Kelley, Robert E., Myth of the Color-Blind Judge: An Empirical Analysis of Racial Harassment Cases (2008). Washington University Law Review, Vol. 86, 2009; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-29. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1273235

Contact Information

Pat K. Chew (Contact Author)
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
412-648-1378 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.pitt.edu/faculty/profiles/chewpk

Robert E. Kelley
Carnegie Mellon University - David A. Tepper School of Business ( email )
5000 Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,427
Downloads: 187
Download Rank: 89,925
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  112

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.641 seconds