Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1273325
 
 

Footnotes (451)



 


 



Federal Rule of Evidence 502: Stirring the State Law of Privilege and Professional Responsibility with a Federal Stick


Henry S. Noyes


Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law

September 24, 2008

Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 66, p. 673, 2009
Chapman University Law Research Paper No. 08-285

Abstract:     
Federal Rule of Evidence 502 was signed into law by President Bush on September 19, 2008. It is the last piece of the puzzle of e-discovery amendments.

Rule 502 quietly takes the first steps toward federalization of two areas of law that traditionally have been subject to state regulation: The law governing waiver of the attorney-client privilege and the law governing an attorney's duties of professional conduct. This Article focuses on Rule 502(d) - the heart of this new Federal Rule of Evidence. This subsection permits a federal court to issue an order that protects against waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work product protection despite a party's voluntary disclosure to an adversary of such protected or privileged information during discovery. The express purpose of Rule 502(d) is to relieve the disclosing party of the burden and cost of paying its attorneys to conduct a document-by-document review for privileged or protected information.

This initial foray into the area of state privilege law and state law of professional responsibility has long been resisted because of abiding concern with comity, issues of federalism and respect for the autonomous operation of state courts and state litigation systems. This Article identifies and considers the significant (and unforeseen) practical consequences of breaching the protective zone that has previously existed surrounding the States' operation of their own court systems, state rules of procedure and state rules of professional responsibility. It also addresses serious questions regarding the constitutional authority of Congress to enact such a rule and numerous practical and constitutional problems that will arise when applying the rule.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 91

Keywords: evidence, 502, ediscovery, privilege, professional responsibility, commerce clause

JEL Classification: K40, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 29, 2008 ; Last revised: May 3, 2012

Suggested Citation

Noyes, Henry S., Federal Rule of Evidence 502: Stirring the State Law of Privilege and Professional Responsibility with a Federal Stick (September 24, 2008). Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 66, p. 673, 2009; Chapman University Law Research Paper No. 08-285. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1273325

Contact Information

Henry S. Noyes (Contact Author)
Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law ( email )
One University Drive
Orange, CA 92866-1099
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,962
Downloads: 319
Download Rank: 55,280
Footnotes:  451

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds