Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1273884
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (271)



 


 



Abandoning Standing: Trading a Rule of Access for a Rule of Deference


Richard W. Murphy


Texas Tech University School of Law


Administrative Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 4, 2008
William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 100
Texas Tech Law School Research Paper No. 2009-07

Abstract:     
The Supreme Court's long struggle over the nature of constitutional standing has taken on new urgency with the addition of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito to the Court. Four justices are now strongly committed to a restrictive approach to standing that invokes separation of powers to bar federal courts from hearing the claims of plaintiffs who assert mere "generalized grievances." These four were just one vote away in Massachusetts v. EPA from blocking judicial review of the legality of EPA's failure to regulate greenhouse gases on the ground that global warming does not cause "particularized" injury. Four justices are strongly committed to a permissive approach that permits widely shared injuries to support standing so long as they are "concrete" enough. And Justice Kennedy's views are somewhere in the middle.

This Article uses this 4-1-4 split as an occasion to reexamine constitutional standing and, in particular, its relation to separation of powers. It concludes that neither the restrictive nor the permissive approach to standing can justify reliance on an indeterminate "injury" requirement to create a constitutional bar to judicial access. Nonetheless, the separation-of-powers concerns that motivate the restrictive approach do justify a rule of judicial deference. More specifically, just as Professor Louis Jaffe suggested nearly fifty years ago, these concerns justify a rule that courts should, when resolving "public actions," defer to the reasonable judgments of political branch officials.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: standing, separation of powers, judicial deference

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 29, 2008 ; Last revised: November 30, 2009

Suggested Citation

Murphy, Richard W., Abandoning Standing: Trading a Rule of Access for a Rule of Deference. Administrative Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 4, 2008; William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 100; Texas Tech Law School Research Paper No. 2009-07. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1273884

Contact Information

Richard Wyman Murphy (Contact Author)
Texas Tech University School of Law ( email )
1802 Hartford
Lubbock, TX 79409
United States
806-742-3990 ex.320 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 504
Downloads: 73
Download Rank: 193,211
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  271

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds