SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (160)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

An Extinction Bar to Patentability

Andrew W. Torrance
University of Kansas - School of Law



Georgetown International Environmental Law Review (GIELR), Vol. 20, pp. 237-270, 2008

Abstract:     
Biodiversity possesses significant economic value, not least as a source of natural biochemicals discovered through bioprospecting. However, human activities are currently destroying biodiversity at a rapid rate, along with a rich source of natural biochemicals. Stemming this destruction requires novel conservation instruments, and the enablement requirement of patent law can be harnessed to provide one. The enablement requirement presents a significant hurdle to the patentability of biotechnological inventions, including those involving natural biochemicals. However, applying the logic of Ex parte Rinehart (Bd. Pat. App. Int. 1985), a case involving the patentability of natural biochemicals derived from a marine organism called a tunicate, a patent applicant should be able to satisfy the enablement requirement for patenting natural biochemical inventions by disclosing in a patent application specific kinds of useful information about an invention. Notably, source organisms of natural biochemicals could themselves be considered in situ deposits in satisfaction of the enablement requirement in exchange for provision by patent applicants of detailed information regarding the specific location, habitat, geographic range, and phylogenetic relationships of the source organisms. The information thus generated would enhance the public storehouse of knowledge, providing detailed information useful to biologists, conservationists, and future inventors. In addition, the in situ deposit could create an 'extinction bar' to patentability and enforceability because disappearance of the source organism would lead to loss of patent rights. This extinction bar would provide a new incentive for conservation of biodiversity because the economic interests of both patent applicant and source country would be aligned to ensure the survival of any source species upon whose survival monopoly profits rested. No modification of current patent law would be required, only proper application of existing, though as yet unrealized, patent law.

Keywords: patents, biodiversity, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medicine, bioprospecting, biological deposits, enablement, extinction, conservation

JEL Classifications: K11, K23, K29, K32, K33, K39, K42

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: September 29, 2008 ; Last revised: September 29, 2008

Suggested Citation

Torrance, Andrew W., An Extinction Bar to Patentability (September 26, 2008). Georgetown International Environmental Law Review (GIELR), Vol. 20, pp. 237-270, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1274255


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Andrew W. Torrance (Contact Author)
University of Kansas - School of Law ( email )
Green Hall
1535 W. 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045-7577
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 317
Downloads: 192
Download Rank: 44,309
Footnotes: 160

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.125 seconds.