|
||||
|
||||
The Free Jammie Movement: Is Making a File Available to Other Users Over a Peer-to-Peer Computer Network Sufficient to Infringe the Copyright Owner's 17 U.S.C. Section 106(3) Distribution Right?
Ken Nicholds Fordham Law Review Fordham Law Review, Vol. 78, No. 2, 2009 Abstract: Of the thousands of lawsuits brought by the Recording Industry Association of America against individuals for sharing music files over the Internet, the case of Jammie Thomas-Rasset was the first to complete a full jury trial. The judge vacated the initial judgment against Thomas-Rasset because he found, sua sponte, that he was mistaken when he instructed the jury that making a file available over a computer network for others to download is sufficient to find infringement of the exclusive distribution right of the copyright owner under 17 U.S.C. ยง 106(3). This Note argues that there is no making-available right, but that making-available may be considered as circumstantial evidence of distribution.
Keywords: making available, copyright, peer-to-peer Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 29, 2008 ; Last revised: November 13, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.188 seconds.