|
||||
|
||||
The Association Between Financial Reporting Risk and Audit Fees Before and After the Historic Events Surrounding SOXShannon L. CharlesBrigham Young University Steven M. GloverBrigham Young University Nathan Y. SharpTexas A&M University - Department of Accounting September 1, 2008 Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Forthcoming Abstract: This study investigates whether the association between financial reporting risk and audit fees changed during 2000-2003: a time period marked by momentous and historic events for auditors. We find a positive statistically and economically significant relationship between financial reporting risk and audit fees paid to Big 4 auditors. More importantly, we predict and find that the relation between financial reporting risk and audit fees strengthened significantly in 2002 and 2003, consistent with a shift in the way auditors priced risk, likely in response to the events surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Finally, we provide evidence that a commercially developed, comprehensive risk measure effectively proxies for an element of risk beyond what has traditionally been captured by various risk measures in audit fee models: namely, the risk that financial statements have been intentionally misstated. We believe this risk measure will be of interest to future researchers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35 Keywords: audit fees, financial reporting risk, audit risk, Sarbanes-Oxley JEL Classification: M49, M41, M43, G38 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 30, 2008 ; Last revised: November 1, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.406 seconds