Abstract

 
 

References (32)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



The Adoption of IFRS in the UK


Mari Paananen


University of Hertfordshire

Nimita Parmar


University of Hertfordshire - Business School

June 27, 2008

AAA 2009 Mid-Year International Accounting Section (IAS) Meeting

Abstract:     
There are two approaches which investors can exercise when using accounting information, either to use financial reporting to value or to assess the management's stewardship of the company. Despite the fact that US GAAP, IFRS, and UK GAAP are all market oriented sets of accounting standards, both FASB and IASB are more inclined to require fair value accounting with regards to assets and liabilities compared to UK GAAP, which tend to encourage a stewardship approach. We examine whether investors' shift their focus from earnings to book value of shareholders' equity after the adoption of IFRS in the United Kingdom. As predicted we find that indeed investors seem to rely more on the book value of shareholders' equity and less on earnings information after the adoption of IFRS. We predicted and found no change in the overall increase accounting information's ability to predict future equity values.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: IFRS, stewardship, valuation, United Kingdom

JEL Classification: M41, M44, M47, G12

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 1, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Paananen, Mari and Parmar, Nimita, The Adoption of IFRS in the UK (June 27, 2008). AAA 2009 Mid-Year International Accounting Section (IAS) Meeting. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1275805 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1275805

Contact Information

Mari Paananen (Contact Author)
University of Hertfordshire ( email )
Hertford Herts, SG13 8QF
United Kingdom
Nimita Parmar
University of Hertfordshire - Business School ( email )
College Lane
Hatfield, Hertfordshire Al10 9AB
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,279
Downloads: 1,385
Download Rank: 5,347
References:  32
Citations:  3

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.594 seconds