Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1276344
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (271)



 


 



The Early Roberts Court Attacks Congress's Power to Protect Civil Rights


Rochelle Bobroff


National Senior Citizens Law Center

September 30, 2008

North Carolina Central Law Review, Vol. 30, p. 231, 2008

Abstract:     
While the decisions of the early Roberts Court are couched in legalistic, technical language, the impact of these cases is simple: the Court has threatened the power of Congress to protect civil rights. The conservative bloc has rejected legislative intent, in some cases explicitly choosing not to follow clear expressions of congressional will and in other cases totally ignoring the question of congressional intent. Laws that overrule decisions of the Rehnquist Court have been narrowly construed by the majority, and numerous precedents that uphold civil rights have been limited to their facts or rejected outright. The early Roberts Court has abdicated its role to ensure that administrative interpretations of statutes comport with congressional intent, deferring heavily to executive branch litigation positions that contradict statutory goals. The Court has belittled the expertise of judges and juries to decide complex issues of law and fact, and a majority has explicitly overruled cases that support the equitable power of the judiciary. The conservative Justices have signaled that they will continue the Rehnquist Court's refusal to permit Congress to hold states accountable for violating civil rights. Usurping the constitutional power of Congress, the early Roberts Court has pursued a political agenda of eradicating the protections of individual rights in civil rights statutes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: civil rights, congressional intent, Spending Clause, court access, sovereign immunity

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 4, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Bobroff, Rochelle, The Early Roberts Court Attacks Congress's Power to Protect Civil Rights (September 30, 2008). North Carolina Central Law Review, Vol. 30, p. 231, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1276344

Contact Information

Rochelle Bobroff (Contact Author)
National Senior Citizens Law Center ( email )
1444 I St. NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
United States
202-289-6976 (Phone)
202-289-7224 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.nsclc.org
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 355
Downloads: 35
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  271

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds