Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (67)



 


 



Customs Censorship and the Charter: The Little Sisters Case


Brenda Cossman


University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

Bruce Ryder


Osgoode Hall Law School - York University

October 1, 2008

Constitutional Forum, Vol. 7, No. 4, p. 103, 1996

Abstract:     
Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium is Vancouver's only bookstore specializing in gay and lesbian literature. Little Sisters argued that the provisions of the Customs Act and Customs Tariff that together empower officials to stop obscene representations at the border constitute unreasonable restrictions on freedom of expression and equality rights protected by section 2(b) and section 15 of the Charter.

In our view, Justice Smith's findings on the importance of sexual expression to the gay and lesbian community, and on the disproportionate impact of Customs censorship on gay and lesbian materials, ought to have led to the conclusion that the legislation in its effects violates section 15. On the question of whether the violation of section 2(b) was a reasonable limit, we believe that Smith J. ought to have exercised greater caution in assuming that the reasoning in Butler could be extended, without hesitation or problematization, to gay and lesbian, sexual imagery. Many of the publications suppressed by Customs are integral to the cultural and political identity of a disadvantaged and stigmatized sexual minority. Thus their distribution fosters goals that lie at the heart of the Charter's protection of expression and equality interests in sections 2(b) and 15, respectively. For this reason, we believe that Smith J. erred in not holding the government to a rigourous standard of justification at the section 1 stage of the analysis. We have also taken issue with Smith J.'s failure to implicate the procedural deficiencies of the Customs Act in the Charter violations identified by the evidence. In our view, at the very least, a system of administrative censorship cannot constitute a minimal impairment of Charter rights if it makes little or no attempt to ensure that decisions will be made expeditiously by expert decision-makers who have the ability to receive evidence of a publication's merits.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 3, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Cossman, Brenda and Ryder, Bruce, Customs Censorship and the Charter: The Little Sisters Case (October 1, 2008). Constitutional Forum, Vol. 7, No. 4, p. 103, 1996. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1276389

Contact Information

Brenda Cossman (Contact Author)
University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )
78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada
416-978-6658 (Phone)
Bruce Ryder
Osgoode Hall Law School - York University ( email )
4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 556
Downloads: 68
Download Rank: 172,215
Footnotes:  67

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.890 seconds