Injunction in Defamation Cases
University of California, Irvine School of Law
Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 57, p. 157, 2006-2007
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2008-08
Is an injunction a permissible remedy in a defamation case? The traditional answer is that equity will not enjoin a defamation, but an increasing number of courts have imposed injunctions in defamation actions. The issue was presented to the United States Supreme Court in Tory v. Cochran, but ultimately, was not decided. The plaintiff in the suit, renowned attorney Johnnie Cochran, died a week after oral argument and the Supreme Court resolved the case on narrow grounds without resolving the question presented as to whether injunctions are permissible in defamation cases. The issue is now pending before the California Supreme Court in Balboa Island Village Inn v. Lemen.
The issue is sure to recur across the country. Individuals defamed in a blog or on the internet are likely to turn to the courts and seek injunctions. Perhaps damages will be unavailable as the defendant will not have assets or maybe the plaintiff will just want the false, injurious speech to stop. Can a court issue an injunction?
That is the focus of this article. In addressing this question, the first part of the article recounts the facts of Tory to provide a context for analyzing the issue. The second part of the article explains why injunctions never should be allowed as a remedy in defamation cases.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 3, 2008 ; Last revised: September 11, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds