The Problem with Being Special: Democratic Values and Special Assessments
Ohio State University (OSU) - Department of Political Science
Mathew D. McCubbins
University of Southern California - Marshall School of Business, Gould School of Law and the Department of Political Science
October 2, 2008
In the face of voter-imposed tax limitations, local governments have adopted ever-more complex financial mechanisms to balance their budgets. Increasingly, municipalities in California have made use of special assessments to finance local infrastructure improvements and other vital government services. These assessments bill property owners for public goods and services in proportion to the "special benefits" that they receive. Because benefit assessments are constitutionally distinct from taxes, the growth in assessment financing has come partly as a direct response to increased constraints on the ability of local governments to raise general taxes. Our contention is that this growth should prove cause for concern due to the unusual combination of social choice pathologies to which special assessments fall vulnerable. Field interviews with public officials and the consultants they call on to help create these assessments suggest that special assessments can indeed pose special democratic problems.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55
Keywords: Special benefit assessments, municipal finance, Proposition 13, agenda control, gerrymandering
JEL Classification: H00, H10, H11, H20, H21, H23, H40, H41, H70, H71, H72, H73working papers series
Date posted: October 6, 2008 ; Last revised: February 9, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds