Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1278572
 
 

References (129)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Quantifying the Accuracy of Forensic Examiners in the Absence of a Diagnostic 'Gold Standard'


Douglas Mossman


University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

Michael D. Bowen


affiliation not provided to SSRN

David J. Vanness


affiliation not provided to SSRN

David Bienenfeld


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Terry Correll


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Jerald Kay


affiliation not provided to SSRN

William M. Klykylo


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Douglas S. Lehrer


affiliation not provided to SSRN

November 16, 2011

Law of Human Behavior, Vol. 34, pp. 402-417, 2010
U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 08-23

Abstract:     
Background: In medicine, diagnostic accuracy is usually evaluated against a near-infallible criterion - a "gold standard" - for true disease status. Most mental health classifications have no gold standard, however, and absence of agreed-upon truth is common for psycholegal assessments.

Aims: To show that even without a gold standard, accuracy of forensic assessments can be quantified using latent class methods and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Method: Using redacted court reports, clinicians rated 156 hospitalized criminal defendants on their Dusky-defined competence to stand trial and on their understanding, appreciation, and reasoning about criminal proceedings. Multiple ratings per evaluee permitted estimation of ROC parameters using maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches.

Results: Raters were highly accurate, with ROC areas averaging 0.967 or more.

Conclusions: Accuracy of forensic examinations can be quantified numerically despite the absence of a diagnostic gold standard. Methods used in this study should be applicable to many other psycholegal questions where quantifying accuracy would have scientific and evidentiary value.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: competence to stand trial, adjudicative competence, ROC analysis, diagnostic accuracy, maximum likelihood, Bayesian, gold standard

JEL Classification: C11, C14, C15, C63, K14

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 5, 2008 ; Last revised: November 17, 2011

Suggested Citation

Mossman, Douglas and Bowen, Michael D. and Vanness, David J. and Bienenfeld, David and Correll, Terry and Kay, Jerald and Klykylo, William M. and Lehrer, Douglas S., Quantifying the Accuracy of Forensic Examiners in the Absence of a Diagnostic 'Gold Standard' (November 16, 2011). Law of Human Behavior, Vol. 34, pp. 402-417, 2010; U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 08-23. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1278572 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1278572

Contact Information

Douglas Mossman (Contact Author)
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine ( email )
260 Stetson Street, Suite 3200
P. O. Box 670559
Cincinnati, OH 45219
United States
513-558-4423 (Phone)
Michael D. Bowen
affiliation not provided to SSRN
David J. Vanness
affiliation not provided to SSRN
David Bienenfeld
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Terry Correll
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Jerald Kay
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
William M. Klykylo
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Douglas S. Lehrer
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,051
Downloads: 96
Download Rank: 155,341
References:  129
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.375 seconds