Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279042
 


 



When Daubert Gets Erie: Medical Certainty and Medical Expert Testimony in Federal Court


Robin Kundis Craig


University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law

2000

Denver University Law Review, Vol. 77, 1999-2000
FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 463

Abstract:     
When the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 1993, it changed the process and standards for admitting expert testimony in federal court. Since that decision, most federal courts have assumed that the Daubert analysis is the only standard governing the admissibility of expert testimony in federal court -- even in diversity medical malpractice and medical products liability cases.

However, Daubert did not modify, or even significantly discuss, the Erie doctrine, leaving questions unanswered regarding the admissibility of expert medical testimony when federal courts sit in diversity.

In particular, states often impose medical certainty requirements on expert medical testimony that can affect that testimony's admissibility, the expert's competence to testify, or the plaintiff's burden of proof. This article argues that because these state medical certainty standards generally are substantive enough under Erie to apply in diversity cases and do not directly conflict with the Federal Rules of Evidence or the Daubert analysis, federal courts sitting in diversity should apply the relevant state standard as well as the Daubert analysis in diversity cases that involve medical experts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: Daubert, evidence, medical testimony, Erie doctrine, admissibility, diversity, expert witness

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 6, 2008 ; Last revised: February 17, 2014

Suggested Citation

Craig, Robin Kundis, When Daubert Gets Erie: Medical Certainty and Medical Expert Testimony in Federal Court (2000). Denver University Law Review, Vol. 77, 1999-2000; FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 463. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279042

Contact Information

Robin Kundis Craig (Contact Author)
University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
332 S. 1400 East Front
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 829
Downloads: 49

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.329 seconds