SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (224)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Indigent Defense Reform: The Role of Systemic Litigation in Operationalizing
The Gideon Right to Counsel

Vidhya K. Reddy
Washington University School of Law in St. Louis



Washington U. School of Law Working Paper No. 1279185

Abstract:     
This paper traces the evolution of litigative efforts to structurally reform state and local indigent defense systems, focusing on the potential of modern class action lawsuits to overcome political process failures at the policy-making and policy-implementation stages.

While in Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court substantially expanded counsel rights for indigent defendants, it did not reach the difficult question of how such rights ought to be administered. The task of operationalizing and giving content to the Gideon right to counsel therefore fell upon state and local policy-makers. As some jurisdictions failed to respond to growing pressures on traditional indigent defense systems by allocating greater resources to the defense function, defense advocates increasingly turned to litigation as a means of compelling legislative action and overcoming existing political process failures.

This paper provides a brief historical overview of the growing pressures on state and local indigent defense systems. It then discusses the changing litigative approaches to reform which have evolved in response to the growing indigent defense crisis, focusing on modern injunction-centered class action suits. After considering a series of case studies in Stinson v. Fulton County, Best v. Grant County, Doyle v. Allegheny County Salary Board, and Rivera v. Rowland, this paper discusses the relative advantages of class actions seeking detailed judicial orders as compared with other forms of litigative reform efforts, such as those seeking judicial declarations of unconstitutionality or narrowly tailored injunctive orders. It ultimately concludes that modern class action lawsuits have the unique capacity to generate sustained reform by altering public opinion, changing legislative incentives, fostering cooperation building, and generating court-enforceable settlements.

This paper is also available at the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse (search for case studies).

Keywords: indigent defense, public defender, structural litigation, political process failure, injunctions, Gideon v. Wainwright, right to counsel

JEL Classifications: K14, K40, K41

Working Paper Series

Date posted: October 07, 2008 ; Last revised: October 07, 2008

Suggested Citation

Reddy, Vidhya K., Indigent Defense Reform: The Role of Systemic Litigation in Operationalizing The Gideon Right to Counsel. Washington U. School of Law Working Paper No. 1279185. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279185


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Vidhya K. Reddy (Contact Author)
Washington University School of Law in St. Louis ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 280
Downloads: 69
Download Rank: 100,756
Footnotes: 224

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.094 seconds.