Footnotes (127)



The Judiciary in South Africa: Independence or Illusion?

Penelope Andrews

New York Law School

October 5, 2008

In this chapter I explore judicial independence and legal transformation in South Africa. My central thesis is that judicial independence is one of the key ingredients to ensuring that the transformative possibilities embodied in the Constitution become a reality for the majority of South Africans. Despite widespread approval of the principle of judicial review amongst legal scholars, many have warned that an unelected body sitting in judgment of the powers and functions of elected representatives may erode the basic tenets of democracy. This is particularly so in the case of economic or social policy where courts in their judgments may be at odds with the executive, the legislature and popular sentiment on these matters. Two issues that come to mind are the death penalty and procedural rights for the criminally accused, where evidence suggests that the Court's judgments are not viewed favorably by significant sections of the population. I argue that because of the lingering effects of authoritarianism, racism, sexism, and other forms of prejudice - cultural by-products of colonialism and apartheid - an independent judiciary may rise above these sentiments and ensure that South Africa remains committed to the promises of rights embodied in the Constitution. But my thesis also considers judicial independence in light of the racial and gender transformation of the judiciary. I argue that although thus far the courts, and particularly the Constitutional Court, has demonstrated an impressive independence, the political and racial loyalties of some sectors of the public to the governing party may pose a threat to judicial independence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: judiciary, constitutionalism

JEL Classification: K10, K33

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 6, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Andrews, Penelope, The Judiciary in South Africa: Independence or Illusion? (October 5, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279225 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1279225

Contact Information

Penelope Andrews (Contact Author)
New York Law School ( email )
185 West Broadway
New York, NY 10013
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,102
Downloads: 337
Download Rank: 58,784
Footnotes:  127

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds