Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279599
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (101)



 


 



Is Bad Law Still Law? Is Bad Law Really Law?


Julie Dickson


University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

October 6, 2008

Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 39/2008

Abstract:     
In this article, I discuss various substantive and methodological issues in jurisprudence, prompted by Neil MacCormick's views in Part 4 of his Institutions of Law. I begin by surveying some contemporary legal theoretical views on whether bad law is still, or is really, law, before moving on to compare John Finnis' and Neil MacCormick's views on this question, and on related methodological issues. I attempt to develop and begin to defend a position wherein although it is necessary to understand law's aims, and the values which it ought to realise in order properly to understand its nature, the failure to achieve those aims or to realise those values does not thereby render something less than fully law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 6, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Dickson, Julie, Is Bad Law Still Law? Is Bad Law Really Law? (October 6, 2008). Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 39/2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279599 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1279599

Contact Information

Julie Dickson (Contact Author)
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )
St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,491
Downloads: 739
Download Rank: 17,379
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  101

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.312 seconds