Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279799
 
 

Footnotes (47)



 


 



An Ounce of Prevention: Solving Some Unforeseen Problems with the Proposed Amendments to Rule 56 and the Federal Summary Judgment Process


Adam Steinman


University of Alabama - School of Law

November 24, 2008

Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 103, p. 230, 2008

Abstract:     
The Civil Rules Advisory Committee has recently proposed the most significant revisions to Rule 56 since the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were adopted seventy years ago. Although the stated goal of the proposed amendments is laudable - "to improve the procedures for making and opposing summary-judgment motions, and to facilitate the judge's work in resolving them" - this Essay in the Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy identifies some unanticipated problems with the proposed text. Contrary to the Advisory Committee's intent, the proposed text may inadvertently make substantial changes to the summary-judgment standard and the burdens on litigants at the summary-judgment phase. This Essay suggests specific solutions that would eliminate the potentially troubling consequences of the new rule while preserving its improvements to the summary-judgment process.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: Summary Judgment, Rule 56, FRCP, Federal Rules, Civil Procedure, Advisory Committee, Proposed Amendment, Fed. R. Civ. P, Fed. R. Civ. P. 56

JEL Classification: K1, K40, K41, K49

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 7, 2008 ; Last revised: July 18, 2014

Suggested Citation

Steinman, Adam, An Ounce of Prevention: Solving Some Unforeseen Problems with the Proposed Amendments to Rule 56 and the Federal Summary Judgment Process (November 24, 2008). Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 103, p. 230, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279799

Contact Information

Adam Steinman (Contact Author)
University of Alabama - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,910
Downloads: 262
Download Rank: 67,355
Footnotes:  47

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds