|
||||
|
||||
An Ounce of Prevention: Solving Some Unforeseen Problems with the Proposed Amendments to Rule 56 and the Federal Summary Judgment ProcessAdam SteinmanSeton Hall University - School of Law November 24, 2008 Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 103, p. 230, 2008 Abstract: The Civil Rules Advisory Committee has recently proposed the most significant revisions to Rule 56 since the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were adopted seventy years ago. Although the stated goal of the proposed amendments is laudable - "to improve the procedures for making and opposing summary-judgment motions, and to facilitate the judge's work in resolving them" - this Essay in the Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy identifies some unanticipated problems with the proposed text. Contrary to the Advisory Committee's intent, the proposed text may inadvertently make substantial changes to the summary-judgment standard and the burdens on litigants at the summary-judgment phase. This Essay suggests specific solutions that would eliminate the potentially troubling consequences of the new rule while preserving its improvements to the summary-judgment process.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12 Keywords: Summary Judgment, Rule 56, FRCP, Federal Rules, Civil Procedure, Advisory Committee, Proposed Amendment, Fed. R. Civ. P, Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 JEL Classification: K1, K40, K41, K49 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 7, 2008 ; Last revised: August 15, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.844 seconds