Abstract

 
 

References (57)



 


 



Access to Justice and Litigation Trade-Off: A Theoretical Analysis


Margherita Saraceno


University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics (ACLE); Bocconi University - Centre for Research on Monetary and Financial Economics ; Università Milano-Bicocca

October 1, 2008

Paolo Baffi Centre Research Paper No. 2008-29
CLEA 2008 Meetings Paper

Abstract:     
This paper presents a simple model of disputes resolution both from a macro-perspective (social planner's problem) and from a micro-perspective (parties' choice). Furthermore, it analyzes the effects of a number of policies on: a) victim's access to justice, b) parties' choice between settlement and litigation, c) social costs of disputes resolution. Our research extends the existing literature by showing that reducing litigation rate is not always socially efficient. Rather, in many cases, a social trade-off exists between curbing litigation and enhancing access to justice. Using this framework, we derive policy implications for access to justice and judicial economy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: access to justice, litigation, legal aid, uncertainty

JEL Classification: K41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 11, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Saraceno, Margherita, Access to Justice and Litigation Trade-Off: A Theoretical Analysis (October 1, 2008). Paolo Baffi Centre Research Paper No. 2008-29; CLEA 2008 Meetings Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1280795 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1280795

Contact Information

Margherita Saraceno (Contact Author)
University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics (ACLE) ( email )
Roetersstraat 11
Amsterdam, 1018 WB
Netherlands
Bocconi University - Centre for Research on Monetary and Financial Economics ( email )
Milano, 20136
Italy
Università Milano-Bicocca ( email )
P.zza Ateneo Nuovo, 1
Milano, 20126
Italy
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 409
Downloads: 105
Download Rank: 130,550
References:  57

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.438 seconds