|
||||
|
||||
Access to Justice and Litigation Trade-Off: A Theoretical AnalysisMargherita SaracenoUniversity of Amsterdam - Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics (ACLE); Bocconi University - Centre for Research on Monetary and Financial Economics ; Università Milano-Bicocca October 1, 2008 Paolo Baffi Centre Research Paper No. 2008-29 CLEA 2008 Meetings Paper Abstract: This paper presents a simple model of disputes resolution both from a macro-perspective (social planner's problem) and from a micro-perspective (parties' choice). Furthermore, it analyzes the effects of a number of policies on: a) victim's access to justice, b) parties' choice between settlement and litigation, c) social costs of disputes resolution. Our research extends the existing literature by showing that reducing litigation rate is not always socially efficient. Rather, in many cases, a social trade-off exists between curbing litigation and enhancing access to justice. Using this framework, we derive policy implications for access to justice and judicial economy.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36 Keywords: access to justice, litigation, legal aid, uncertainty JEL Classification: K41 working papers seriesDate posted: October 11, 2008Suggested Citation |
|
||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.438 seconds