Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1281012
 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



A Government of Laws and Not Men: Prohibiting Non-Precedential Opinions by Statute or Procedural Rule


Amy E. Sloan


University of Baltimore - School of Law

2004

Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 79, pp. 711-766, 2004

Abstract:     
Non-precedential judicial opinions issued by the federal appellate courts have generated significant controversy. Given that the federal appellate courts are unlikely to abandon the practice of issuing non-precedential opinions on their own, what other options exist for prohibiting the practice? This article discusses the constitutionality of a procedural rule or statute prohibiting the federal appellate courts from prospectively designating selected opinions as non-precedential. It explains how the rules governing non-precedential opinions allow federal appellate courts to "opt out" of their own rules of precedent. It then examines the rulemaking process, showing how the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure are promulgated pursuant to delegated legislative authority and can, therefore, regulate only matters that Congress could regulate by statute. With those premises in mind, the article then explores the constitutional limits of Congress's ability to regulate the courts' use of precedent. It shows that a federal statute or procedural rule prohibiting prospective designation of selected opinions as non-precedential would be constitutional using both formalist and functionalist reasoning. As long as the statute or rule did not specify the weight federal appellate courts must accord to their own opinions, it would not encroach impermissibly on the courts' Article III judicial power.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: unpublished opinions, non-precedential opinions, judiciary, courts, court rules, statutes

JEL Classification: K39, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 2, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Sloan, Amy E., A Government of Laws and Not Men: Prohibiting Non-Precedential Opinions by Statute or Procedural Rule (2004). Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 79, pp. 711-766, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1281012

Contact Information

Amy E. Sloan (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
United States
410-837-6529 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 426
Downloads: 26
Citations:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds