Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1281040
 
 

Footnotes (66)



 


 



Keeping the Endangered Species Act Relevant


J. B. Ruhl


Vanderbilt University - Law School

October 8, 2008

Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, Forthcoming
FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 322

Abstract:     
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) has long been the workhorse of species protection in contexts for which a species-specific approach can effectively be employed to address discrete human-induced threats that have straightforward causal connections to the decline of a species, such as clearing of occupied habitat for development or damming of a river. Its resounding success there, however, has led to the misperception that it can duplicate that record anywhere and for any reason a species is at risk. Yet is the statute adaptable to the sprawling, sometimes global phenomena that are wearing down our environmental fabric on landscape scales through complex causal mechanisms? For example, can the ESA effectively be used to combat climate change by regulating greenhouse gas emissions, to combat the impacts of urbanization by mandating green buildings, or to mitigate ecological degradation by demanding that resource users take into account the values of natural capital and ecosystem services? This Article suggests that it would be unwise to push the ESA in that direction, but that the ESA nonetheless has a supporting role to play in the development of policies designed to address those problems. In particular, the ESA should be focused toward consolidating its core power to arrest the conversion of intact habitat to urban land uses, and from there it should be used to leverage its habitat protection function to promote policies responding to climate change, urban impacts, ecological degradation, and other ecological problems characterized by complex, large-scale, indirect causal mechanisms.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 11, 2008 ; Last revised: August 31, 2009

Suggested Citation

Ruhl, J. B., Keeping the Endangered Species Act Relevant (October 8, 2008). Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, Forthcoming; FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 322. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1281040

Contact Information

J. B. Ruhl (Contact Author)
Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )
131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 713
Downloads: 107
Download Rank: 144,287
Footnotes:  66
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.406 seconds