Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1282330
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (117)



 


 



Surrogacy and the Politics of Commodification


Elizabeth S. Scott


Columbia University - Law School


Journal of Law and Contemporary Problems, Forthcoming
Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 08-186

Abstract:     
This essay examines the changing social and political meaning of surrogacy contracts over the twenty years since this issue first attracted public attention in the context of the Baby M case in the 1980s. In the protracted course of the Baby M litigation, surrogacy was effectively framed as illegitimate commodification - baby selling and the exploitation of women. This framing can be attributed to a moral panic generated by the media, politicians and a coalition of interest groups opposing surrogacy - primarily feminists and religious conservatives. The framing of surrogacy as commodification had far reaching effects on legal regulation. In the post-Baby M period, lawmakers in many states moved to prohibit or severely restrict surrogacy arrangements. In recent years, however, the framing of surrogacy as commodification has been replaced to a large extent by a more benign characterization which emphasizes the useful service provided by surrogates to childless couples. Further, over the past decade, regulators increasingly have focused on the goal of reducing uncertainty and providing procedures to efficiently establish the parental status of intended parents.

This essay seeks to explain these changes. Several factors have been important: First, hostility to surrogacy has declined because the moral panic has dissipated as many of the predicted harms have not been realized. Further, advances in in vitro fertilization (IVF) have expanded the use of gestational surrogacy, which is less readily framed as commodification and thus, more palatable than traditional surrogacy. Finally, the interest group dynamic has changed: Women's groups have withdrawn, plausibly because the kinds of arguments made against surrogacy increasingly were adopted by anti-abortion advocates. These conditions have contributed to a political climate in which lawmakers have adopted a pragmatic approach, regulating with a goal of minimizing the social cost of surrogacy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 13, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Scott, Elizabeth S., Surrogacy and the Politics of Commodification. Journal of Law and Contemporary Problems, Forthcoming; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 08-186. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1282330

Contact Information

Elizabeth S. Scott (Contact Author)
Columbia University - Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
(212) 854-9758 (Phone)
(212) 854-7946 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,506
Downloads: 393
Download Rank: 39,483
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  117

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.407 seconds