|
||||
|
||||
Food Production, Population Growth, and Environmental SecurityGretchen DailyStanford University - Department of Biological Sciences Partha DasguptaUniversity of Cambridge - Faculty of Economics and Politics; The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences - Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics Bert BolinStockholm University Pierre CrossonResources for the Future Jacques Du GuernyUnited Nations - Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Paul EhrlichStanford University - Department of Biological Sciences Carl FolkeStockholm University AnnMari JanssonStockholm University Bengt-Owe JanssonStockholm University Nils KautskyStockholm University - Department of Systems Ecology Ann KinzigArizona State University (ASU) - Department of Biology Simon LevinPrinceton University - Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Karl-Goran MalerThe Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences - Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics Per Pinstrup-AndersenCornell University - Department of Economics; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Domenico SiniscalcoMinistry of Economy and Finance, Italy; Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei; University of Turin - Department of Economics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) Brian WalkerCSIRO, Mathematical and Information Science March 1998 Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper No. 21.98 Abstract: There are two broad criteria by which one can judge humanity's success in feeding itself: (i) the proportion of people whose access to basic nutritional requirements is secure; and (ii) the extent to which global food production is sustainable. Even though the two are related, they have usually been discussed separately in popular writings. This has had unfortunate consequences. Writings on (ii) have often encouraged readers to adopt an all-or-nothing position (viz. the future will be either rosy or catastrophic), and this has drawn attention away from the economic misery that is endemic in large parts of the world today. On the other hand, writings on (i) have frequently yielded no more than the catechism that the nearly 1 billion people in poor countries who go to bed hungry each night do so because they are extremely poor. In short, if (ii) has focused on aggregate food production and its prospects for the future, (i) in contrast has isolated food-distribution failure as a cause of world hunger. In this article we will adopt the view that (i) and (ii) should not be studied separately, that their link can be understood if attention is paid to the dynamic interactions between ecological and economic systems operating primarily at the geographically localised level.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10 JEL Classification: O10, Q28, Q38 working papers seriesDate posted: September 17, 1998Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.625 seconds