|
||||
|
||||
Food Production, Population Growth, and Environmental Security
Gretchen Daily Stanford University - Department of Biological Sciences Partha Dasgupta University of Cambridge - Faculty of Economics and Politics; The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences - Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics Bert Bolin Stockholm University Pierre Crosson Resources for the Future Jacques Du Guerny United Nations - Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Paul Ehrlich Stanford University - Department of Biological Sciences Carl Folke Stockholm University AnnMari Jansson Stockholm University Bengt-Owe Jansson Stockholm University Nils Kautsky Stockholm University - Department of Systems Ecology Ann Kinzig Arizona State University - Department of Biology Simon Levin Princeton University - Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Karl-Goran Maler The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences - Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics Per Pinstrup-Andersen Cornell University - Department of Economics; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Domenico Siniscalco Ministry of Economy and Finance, Italy; Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei; University of Turin - Department of Economics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) Brian Walker CSIRO, Lyneham, ACT March 1998 Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper No. 21.98 Abstract: There are two broad criteria by which one can judge humanity's success in feeding itself: (i) the proportion of people whose access to basic nutritional requirements is secure; and (ii) the extent to which global food production is sustainable. Even though the two are related, they have usually been discussed separately in popular writings. This has had unfortunate consequences. Writings on (ii) have often encouraged readers to adopt an all-or-nothing position (viz. the future will be either rosy or catastrophic), and this has drawn attention away from the economic misery that is endemic in large parts of the world today. On the other hand, writings on (i) have frequently yielded no more than the catechism that the nearly 1 billion people in poor countries who go to bed hungry each night do so because they are extremely poor. In short, if (ii) has focused on aggregate food production and its prospects for the future, (i) in contrast has isolated food-distribution failure as a cause of world hunger. In this article we will adopt the view that (i) and (ii) should not be studied separately, that their link can be understood if attention is paid to the dynamic interactions between ecological and economic systems operating primarily at the geographically localised level.
JEL Classifications: O10, Q28, Q38 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: September 17, 1998 ; Last revised: September 18, 1998Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.218 seconds.