Abstract

 
 

References (61)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Pre-Coordination + Post-Coordination = the Case for Partial Coordination


David Bodoff


New York University (NYU)

Ajit Kambil


Deloitte Services LP

July 1997

NYU Working Paper No. 2451/14173

Abstract:     
The introduction of computerized post-coordination has solvedmany of the problems of pre-coordinated subject access. However, theadoption of computerized post-coordination results in the loss of some precoordinationbenefits. Specifically, the effect of hiding terms within thecontext of others is lost in post-coordination which gives lead status to everydocument term, This results in spurious matches of terms out of context.Library patrons and Internet searchers are increasingly dissatisfied withsubject access performance, in part because of unmanageably large retrievalsets. The need to enhance precision and limit the size of retrieval setsmotivates this work which proposes partial coordination, an approach whichincorporates the advantages of computer search with the ability of precoordinationto limit spurious partial matches and thereby enhance precision.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 13, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Bodoff, David and Kambil, Ajit, Pre-Coordination + Post-Coordination = the Case for Partial Coordination (July 1997). Information Systems Working Papers Series, Vol. , pp. -, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1283015

Contact Information

David Bodoff
New York University (NYU) ( email )
Bobst Library, E-resource Acquisitions
20 Cooper Square 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10003-711
United States
Ajit Kambil
Deloitte Services LP ( email )
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.kambil.com
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 439
Downloads: 32
References:  61
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.438 seconds