|
||||
|
||||
A New Measure of Accounting Quality*Paul HribarUniversity of Iowa - Henry B. Tippie College of Business Todd D. KravetUniversity of Texas at Dallas - School of Management Ryan J. WilsonUniversity of Iowa - Henry B. Tippie College of Business April 27, 2010 Abstract: This study examines an alternative approach to measuring accounting quality. Adopting a neoclassical view of the audit market, we argue that unexplained audit fees are a measure of accounting quality. We develop a comprehensive model of audit fee determinants to estimate unexplained audit fees. We use the framework developed by Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to examine the construct validity of our new measure. We find that our audit fee-based measure of quality correlates positively with other empirical measures of quality. We further show our measure is predictive of fraud, restatements, and SEC comment letters, even after controlling for other measures of accounting quality. Finally, we show that it is less associated with innate firm characteristics than measures based on realized earnings, making it a good candidate for studies examining the economic consequences of accounting quality.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50 Keywords: Accounting Quality, Restatements, Fraud, Audit Fees JEL Classification: M41, M43, M49, G12 working papers seriesDate posted: October 14, 2008 ; Last revised: June 28, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.516 seconds