|
||||
|
||||
Looking Out, Locking In: Financial Models and the Social Dynamics of Arbitrage Disasters
Daniel Beunza London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Department of Management David Stark Columbia University September 25, 2009 Abstract: This study analyzes the opportunities and dangers created by financial models. Through ethnographic observations in the derivatives trading room of a major investment bank, we found that traders use models in reverse to look out for possible errors in their financial estimates. We refer to this practice as reflexive modeling. The strength of reflexive modeling resides in leveraging the cognitive independence among dispersed, anonymous actors. But as our analysis demonstrates, it can also give rise to cognitive interdependence. When enough traders overlook a key issue, their positions send the wrong message to the rest of the market. The resulting lock-in leads to arbitrage disasters. Our analysis challenges behavioral finance by locating the root of systemic risk in the calculative tools used by the actors, rather than in their individual biases and limitations.
Keywords: Merger Arbitrage, Systemic Risk, Model JEL Classifications: C51, G10 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: October 16, 2008 ; Last revised: September 30, 2009Suggested Citation |
|
||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.515 seconds.