State Fiscal Crises: Are Rapid Spending Increases to Blame?

Abstract:     
During recessions, state governments frequently face substantial midyear budget shortfalls. Numerous states are now experiencing such crises again. These fiscal crises are often blamed on the cyclical decline in revenue growth or reductions in federal aid. Others have suggested that enacting rapid spending increases during expansionary years - rather than using the revenue windfalls for tax cuts or increases in rainy day funds - may be an important contributing factor to those budget shortfalls. Using data from the 2001 recession, we find support for that "overspending" hypothesis. While neither the mere presence nor the size of a rainy day fund were significant predictors of fiscal stress, faster increases in spending are positively and significantly associated with fiscal stress. When rainy day funds work, it is the strength of their withdrawal rules that matter. These results have important implications for fiscal policy choices. States that restrain spending growth during expansionary years and implement strong rainy day fund withdrawal rules are likely to face less severe fiscal crises during recessions.

Keywords: fiscal stress, government spending, rainy day fund, business cycles

JEL Classifications: H7, E6, D7

Accepted Paper Series