Revitalizing Section 5 of the FTC Act Using 'Consumer Choice' Analysis
Robert H. Lande
University of Baltimore - School of Law
October 17, 2008
Antitrust Source, Vol. 8, No. 3, February 2009
University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-18
This paper makes two points. First, Section 5 of the FTC Act, properly construed, is indeed significantly broader and more encompassing than the Sherman Act or Clayton Act. Section 5 violations include incipient violations of the other antitrust laws, and also violations of their policy or spirit.
Second, the best - and probably the only - way to interpret Section 5 in an expansive manner is to do so in a way that also is relatively definite, predictable, principled and clearly bounded. This best can be done if Section 5 is articulated using the consumer choice framework. Without the discipline and constraints provided by this framework, the FTC Act risks becoming unduly standardless. Unless the Commission uses the choice framework, any attempt to construe Section 5 that goes beyond the other antitrust laws risks being viewed as giving undue discretion to the Commission, and for this reason probably will not be permitted by reviewing courts.
The paper also presents three illustrations of how this could make a beneficial difference in practice: situations similar to the N Data case, invitations to collude, and incipient tying and exclusive dealing violations.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 7
Keywords: Antitrust, Federal Trade Commission, trade regulation, collusion, tying, exclusive dealing, consumer choice
JEL Classification: K21, L40Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 20, 2008 ; Last revised: July 14, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.329 seconds