Abstract

 


 



Futures Versus Share Contracting as Alternatives for Diversifying Output Risk


David A. Hirshleifer


University of California, Irvine - Paul Merage School of Business

Avanidhar Subrahmanyam


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Finance Area


Economic Journal, Vol. 103, pp. 620-639, May 1993

Abstract:     
Two means by which commodity producers can reduce their exposure to quantity risk are share contracting and futures hedging. This paper explains the coexistence of these arrangements by showing that these will normally be complementary means of transferring risk. Share contracting by a purchaser with many producers can help diversify imperfectly correlated quantity risks. Futures contracts, on the other hand, hedge the systematic but not the idiosyncratic components of output risk. Thus, futures hedging helps to ameliorate the main disadvantage of multiple share contracting, an excessive loading of systematic risk on the purchaser.

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: December 1, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Hirshleifer, David A. and Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar, Futures Versus Share Contracting as Alternatives for Diversifying Output Risk. Economic Journal, Vol. 103, pp. 620-639, May 1993. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1287745

Contact Information

David A. Hirshleifer (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine - Paul Merage School of Business ( email )
Irvine, CA California 92697-3125
United States
Avanidhar Subrahmanyam
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Finance Area ( email )
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1481
United States
310-825-5355 (Phone)
310-206-5455 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 174

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.360 seconds