Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1288149
 
 

Footnotes (227)



 


 



Setting the Standard: A Fraud-based Approach to Antitrust Pleading in Standard Development Organization Cases


James Esten Abell III


University of Chicago - Law Review

October 22, 2008

University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 4, 2008

Abstract:     
This Comment addresses the question of whether claims brought under Section 2 of the Sherman Act based on allegations of deception of a Standards Development Organization ("SDO") must meet the heightened pleading requirements of Rule 9(b). Despite the growing amount of litigation in this area, to date, no court has specifically addressed this matter. The Comment explores how courts have approached similar questions in other areas involving intellectual property law and antitrust law, such as Walker Process fraud claims. Ultimately, the Comment suggests a framework for evaluating these new claims and concludes that within the framework, SDO-based antitrust claims do meet the requirements for heightened pleading.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: antitrust, SSO, SDO, pleading, Rule 9, patent

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 24, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Abell, James Esten, Setting the Standard: A Fraud-based Approach to Antitrust Pleading in Standard Development Organization Cases (October 22, 2008). University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 4, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1288149

Contact Information

James Esten Abell III (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law Review ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 704
Downloads: 113
Download Rank: 143,278
Footnotes:  227

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.344 seconds