Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1288229
 


 



Settlements: The Limits of Same-Case Enforcement


Jeffrey A. Parness


Northern Illinois University - College of Law

October 22, 2008

Illinois Bar Journal, Vol. 96, 2008

Abstract:     
Can civil litigants enforce settlements resolving their actions before the very trial judges who presided over those actions? And, are such same case enforcements always subject to similar guidelines in federal and state trial courts? This short paper answers these questions, responding not always and no.

The paper employs Director of Insurance v. A and A Midwest Rebuilders, Inc., 891 N.E.2d 500 (Ill.App.2d 2008) to explore the limits of same case enforcement authority and the differences in federal and state practices. The state appellate court correctly distinguished federal court precedents that focused on distinctions between dismissals with and without prejudice. It instead looked to distinctions between judgment enforcement and judgment modification.

Unfortunately, the court in A and A also sanctioned same case enforcement where the earlier dismissal was made "pursuant to the terms" of a settlement that was not made part of the record. While relying on Lynch v. Samatamason Inc., 279 F.3d 487 (7th Cir. 2002), the Illinois state court did not follow the "standard practice" suggested in Lynch. Under Lynch, upon settlement subject to possible same case enforcement, the trial judge normally should call in the court reporter and dictate the terms of an oral agreement, or should place a written agreement on the record. As well, the judge should make sure all parties consent. Further, the court in A and A failed to address the public record nature of some civil case settlements, discussed in Jessup v. Luther, 277 F.3d 926 (7th Cir. 2002), cited by the A and A court.

Not all civil case settlements are subject to same case enforcement. Final judgments should clearly reflect when settlement enforcement jurisdiction is retained. When same case enforcement is possible, trial judges should follow public access limits imposed by both First Amendment and common law decisions. Further, judges and lawyers should recognize that settlement enforcement guidelines may differ in federal and state courts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 3

Keywords: Civil procedure, litigation, settlements, enforcement, settlement enforcement, federal civil practive, Illinois civil practice

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 24, 2008 ; Last revised: December 14, 2008

Suggested Citation

Parness, Jeffrey A., Settlements: The Limits of Same-Case Enforcement (October 22, 2008). Illinois Bar Journal, Vol. 96, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1288229

Contact Information

Jeffrey A. Parness (Contact Author)
Northern Illinois University - College of Law ( email )
Swen Parson Hall
DeKalb, IL 60115
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 463
Downloads: 31

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds